Chris L. Jones et al v. A Buyer s Choice Home Insptections, ltd., et al
| Chris L. Jones and Jeffrey V Jones |
| A Buyer s Choice Home Inspections USA, LLC, A Buyer s Choice Home Inspections, LLC, A Buyer s Choice Home Inspections, Ltd., ABCHI Investments, LLC, ABCHI Operations, LLC, Does, William J Redfern and Arne Trejno |
| 8:2017cv00768 |
| April 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J. Carney |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court REMANDS this case to Orange County Superior Court. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (iv)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney.The Court orders Plaintiffs to show cause in writing by Thursday, April 2, 2020, at 12 noon, why this action should not be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants may submit a response by the same deadline. (iv)
|
|
Filing
92
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT WILLIAM REDFERN AND HIS COUNSEL, AL MOHAJERIAN, SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OR SANCTIONED by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Mr. Redfern and Mr. Mohajerian are DIRECTED to file a written response or written responses to this order to show cause by February 28, 2020. Plaintiffs shall submit any written opposition to the response(s) by March 6, 2020. A hearing on this order to show cause is scheduled for March 16, 2020 at 1:30 p.m (iv)
|
|
Filing
91
CERTIFICATION AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONS by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant William Redfern and Defendants' counsel, Al Mohajerian, shall appear before the Honorable Cormac J. Carneyat a time and place to be set by him in a separate Orderand then and there show cause why they should not be adjudged in contempt or sanctioned by reason of the facts certified herein. (kh)
|
|
Filing
68
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT OF COURT AND SANCTIONS by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth.By no later than Friday, November 22, 2019, defendant is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why defendant and defendant's counsel should not be held in contempt of court and sanctioned for perpetrating a fraud on the Court; perjury; failing to comply with Court orders, Local Rules, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, and counsel's duty of candor to the court; and needlessly increasing the cost of litigation and burden on the Court. (see document for further details) (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A, # 2 Attachment B, # 3 Attachment C) (hr)
|
|
Filing
41
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth re sECOND Stipulation for Protective Order 40 . (kh)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi re Stipulation for Protective Order 16 . (kh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
