Clara Yvonne Heath v. Minyard Morris, LP et al
Clara Yvonne Heath |
Michael A. Morris, Matthew S. Buttacavoli, Minyard Morris, LP and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
8:2017cv00824 |
May 9, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Josephine L Staton |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1330 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: granting #20 MOTION to Dismiss Case. The Court hereby APPROVES the parties stipulation and DISMISSES all claims without prejudice. As stipulated, the parties are to bear their own fees and costs. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (twdb) |
Filing 21 NOTICE OF LODGING filed November 20, 2017 re Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #20 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(O'Meara, Frances) |
Filing 20 Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Matthew S. Buttacavoli, Minyard Morris, LP, Michael A. Morris. (O'Meara, Frances) |
Filing 19 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Matthew S. Buttacavoli, Minyard Morris, LP, Michael A. Morris.(Attorney Frances O'Meara added to party Matthew S. Buttacavoli(pty:dft), Attorney Frances O'Meara added to party Minyard Morris, LP(pty:dft), Attorney Frances O'Meara added to party Michael A. Morris(pty:dft))(O'Meara, Frances) |
Filing 18 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs timely-filed Declarations in response to the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause issued October 5, 2017 is hereby DISCHARGED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Clara Yvonne Heath, upon Defendant Minyard Morris, LP served on 10/11/2017, answer due 11/1/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant: Minyard Morris, LLP in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bayuk, Christopher) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Defendant Clara Yvonne Heath, upon Defendant Michael A. Morris served on 10/11/2017, answer due 11/1/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant: Michael Morris in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bayuk, Christopher) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Clara Yvonne Heath, upon Defendant Matthew S. Buttacavoli served on 10/11/2017, answer due 11/1/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant: Mathew Buttacavoli in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bayuk, Christopher) |
Filing 14 DECLARATION of Christopher W. Bayuk re Declaration #12 , Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines #10 Supplemental filed by Plaintiff Clara Yvonne Heath. (Bayuk, Christopher) |
Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition #9 as to Defendant(s) Matthew S. Buttacavoli, Minyard Morris, LP, Michael A. Morris. (dv) |
Filing 12 DECLARATION of Christopher W. Bayuk re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines #10 filed by Plaintiff Clara Yvonne Heath. (Bayuk, Christopher) |
Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #9 filed by Plaintiff Clara Yvonne Heath. (Bayuk, Christopher) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Josephine L. Staton: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response.( Show Cause Response due by 10/12/2017.) (twdb) |
Filing 9 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Clara Yvonne Heath(Bayuk, Christopher) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg) |
Filing 7 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Clara Yvonne Heath. (Bayuk, Christopher) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Clara Yvonne Heath. (Bayuk, Christopher) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Clara Yvonne Heath. (Bayuk, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-19818988 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Clara Yvonne Heath. (Attorney Christopher W Bayuk added to party Clara Yvonne Heath(pty:pla))(Bayuk, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.