Orange County Coastkeeper v. City of San Juan Capistrano et al
| Orange County Coastkeeper |
| Blenheim Facility Management and City of San Juan Capistrano |
| 8:2017cv00956 |
| June 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| Josephine L. Staton |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
THIRD REVISED JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a), the Court revises the Second Revised Judgment (Doc. 85) consistent with the parties' concurrently entered Third Amended Consent Decree. (rolm) Modified on 5/24/2024 (rolm).
|
|
Filing
85
SECOND REVISED JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Pursuant to FRCP 58(a), the Court revises the Revised Judgment (Doc. 73 ) consistent with the parties' concurrently entered Second Amended Consent Decree. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (jp)
|
|
Filing
73
REVISED JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Pursuant to FRCP 58(a), the Court revises theJudgment (Doc. 68 ) consistent with the parties' concurrently entered Amended Consent Decree. (jp)
|
|
Filing
68
JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a), the Court enters Judgment consistent with the parties' concurrently entered Consent Decree. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
