Leonard Luna et al v. Hansen and Adkins Auto Transport, Inc et al
David Arriola, Leonard Luna and Manuel Zapata |
Does and Hansen and Adkins Auto Transport, Inc |
8:2017cv00990 |
June 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O. Carter |
Karen E. Scott |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 56 by Judge David O. Carter. This action came on for hearing before the Court on June 11, 2018, the Hon. David O. Carter, District Judge Presiding, on the Motion fo r Summary Judgment of Defendant Hansen & Adkins Auto Transport Inc., and the evidence presented having been fully considered, the issues having been duly heard and a decision having been duly rendered for the reasons set forth in the Court's ORD ER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. 63), therefore, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Defendant Hansen & Adkins Auto Transport Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, that the Plaintiffs take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits, and that Defendant recover its costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro) |
Filing 44 ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 41 by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (See attachment for further details). (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.