Suzanne Napier v. W.J. Newport, LLC et al
| Suzanne Napier |
| Sunstone Von Karman, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive and W.J. Newport, LLC |
| 8:2017cv01130 |
| June 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J Guilford |
| Karen E Scott |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 24
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint #23 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: The Court, having considered the pleadings, motions, and evidence before it, along with arguments of counsel, grants Plaintiff leave to file her First Amended Complaint. Hearing set for April 2, 2018 at 10:00 am is VACATED. (lwag)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier. Motion set for hearing on 4/2/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Proposed Order) (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 22 DECLARATION of Craig G. Cote re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to file First Amended Complaint #19 filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 21
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford denying #19 MOTION to Amend. (see document for details). (dro)
|
| Filing 20 DECLARATION of Craig G. Cote In support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to file First Amended Complaint #19 filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to file First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier. Motion set for hearing on 12/18/2017 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Proposed Order) (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to W.J. Newport, LLC. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 17 Third STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to W.J. Newport, LLC answer now due 10/6/2017, filed by Defendant W.J. Newport, LLC.(Resnick, Mitchell) |
| Filing 16 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to W.J. Newport, LLC answer now due 9/15/2017, filed by Defendant W.J. Newport, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Resnick, Mitchell) |
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER SPECIFYING PROCEDURES (lb)
|
| Filing 14 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held: Discovery cut-off 5/7/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/23/2018 at 8:30 am. Jury Trial set for 8/7/2018 at 9:00 am. Court Reporter: Deborah Parker. (lb) |
| Filing 13 JOINT STIPULATION, on behalf of both parties, for Disposition of Claim from Relief From Decision of the Commissioner,, STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to W.J. Newport, LLC answer now due 9/1/2014, filed by Defendant W.J. Newport, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Attorney Mitchell J Resnick added to party W.J. Newport, LLC(pty:dft))(Resnick, Mitchell) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier, upon Defendant W.J. Newport, LLC served on 7/20/2017, answer due 8/10/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Stan C- Person on Charge Authorized to accept service for Yongji Li- Agent for service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier, upon Defendant Sunstone Von Karman, LLC served on 7/18/2017, answer due 8/8/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Dena La Porta- Clerk of First Corporate Solutions Inc.- Agent for service of Unisearch Inc. Agent for Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER for Status Conference by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court ORDERS that this hearing take place on August 21, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. (dro)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sunstone Von Karman, LLC. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant W.J. Newport, LLC. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier, identifying W.J. NEWPORT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, dba, The Duke Hotel; Sunstone Von Karman, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-20114301 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Suzanne Napier. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party Suzanne Napier(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
