Maria Morales et al v. FCA US LLC, et al
| Maria Morales and Jessica Ocampo |
| Does, FCA US LLC and Tuttle-Click, Inc. |
| 8:2017cv01418 |
| August 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J. Carney |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FEE REQUEST by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Wirtz firm is ordered to show cause why the fee motion should not be dismissed based on the defects. I'll take a declaration from a responsible lawyer by November 28 (NTE five pages) to respond to the Court's concerns. The hearing on the motion is VACATED. No response from Fiat Chrysler will be required until further order. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
|
Filing
47
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: DEFECTIVE MOTIONS / ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The responding attorney will file a declaration (NTE five pages) by Monday, January 14, explaining how we got here. (See Minute Order for fu rther details) re: MOTION IN LIMINE (#9) to Preclude Argument that Defendant was Not Given a Reasonable Number of Repair Opportunities to Repair Plaintiffs' Vehicle or Argument or Reference to the Tanner Act Presumption 41 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#12) to Exclude Testimony Regarding Date of Complaint 44 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#5) to Preclude Testimony or Evidence Regarding Any Claim of a Disclaimer or Expiration of the Implied Warranty 37 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#1) to Exclude Legal Op inions as to the Applicability of Warranty Coverage 33 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#13) to Preclude Reference to Any Post-Litigation Settlement Offers 45 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#8) to Exclude Testimony that Plaintiffs Misused, Abused, or Failed to M aintain the Subject Vehicle 40 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#7) to Preclude Argument that the Authorized Dealership is Not the Agent of Defendant During Warranty Repairs and Sale 39 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#11) to Exclude Testimony Regarding Subject V ehicle's Mileage 43 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#4) to Preclude Testimony Regarding Defendant's Ability to Repair or Cost of Repairing the Vehicle 36 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#2) to Preclude Reference to Attorney's Fees 34 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#3) to Preclude Testimony or Reference to Increased Costs of Vehicles 35 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#6) to Preclude Testimony or Evidence Relating to Plaintiff's Financial Condition 38 , MOTION IN LIMINE (#10) to Exclude Evidence or Testimony Regarding Attorney Advertisements 42 . (vm)
|
|
Filing
11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff's counsel, to show cause in writing no later than December 14, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution for failure to file a joint report (FRCivP 26). As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: (see document for details). (dro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
