Craig R. Doiron et al v. City of Santa Ana et al
| Craig R. Doiron and David C. Peterson |
| Daniel Baek, John Choe, City of Santa Ana, Crevier BMW, Does, Penske Automotive Group, Inc., Penske Corporation and Penske Vehicle Services, Inc. |
| 8:2017cv01584 |
| September 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E. McDermott |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: RE: DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 65 . Court hereby DENIES defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs claim for violation of § 1983 insofar as i t is based on the September12, 2015 arrest.The Court DISMISSES without prejudice plaintiffs claim for violation of §1983 as against Choe insofar as it is based on the September 21, 2015 arrest.The Court hereby DENIES defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs claim for violation of § 52.1 as against Choe and Crevier.The Court hereby DENIES defendants motion to dismiss plaintiffs claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress as against Choe and Crevier. The Court DISMISSES with prejudice plaintiffs claim for negligence as against Choe and Crevier. Court Reporter: Lisa Gonzalez. (lc). Modified on 12/4/2018. (lc).
|
|
Filing
47
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: RE DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS 7 , 4 , 29 . (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS AND FULL DISCUSSION). The Court DISMISSES plaintiffs complaint on the grounds that plaintiffs have failed to prov ide clear and concise allegations in compliance with Rule 8. As such, defendants motions are hereby DENIED as moot. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint, which provides fair notice of their claims and the grounds up which each claim rests, on or before July 30, 2018. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
