Nicholas Patrick v. J. Lizarraga
Petitioner: Nicholas Patrick
Respondent: J. Lizarraga
Case Number: 8:2017cv01888
Filed: October 27, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee, in favor of J. Lizarraga against Nicholas Patrick Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 23 . Pursuant to the Order accepting the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nicholas Patrick v. J. Lizarraga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J. Lizarraga
Represented By: Vincent P LaPietra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nicholas Patrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?