Donna Dugo v. Plaza El Toro Investors Limited Partnership et al
| Donna Dugo |
| DOES 1-10, inclusive, Plaza El Toro Investors Limited Partnership and El Toro Plaza LP |
| 8:2017cv01902 |
| October 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| James V Selna |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 25
ORDER of Dismissal Upon Settlement of Case by Judge James V. Selna. The Court having been advised by the counsel for the parties that the above-entitled action has been settled #24 , IT IS ORDERED that this action be and is hereby dismissed in its entirety without prejudice to the right, upon good cause being shown within 45 days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (dro)
|
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: Continuing Scheduling Conference to 4/23/2018 at 10:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. (mt)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIMETO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER THEREON #20 by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS SO STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their undersigned attorneys that: 1. Upon approval of the Court, which approval the parties respectfully request, the time for Defendant El Toro Plaza L.P. to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended until and including April 12, 2018. (es)
|
| Filing 21 STIPULATION to Reschedule Scheduling Conference filed by plaintiff Donna Dugo.(Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 20 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Respond to Complaint as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to El Toro Plaza LP answer now due 4/12/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant El Toro Plaza LP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Elise Malia Kern added to party El Toro Plaza LP(pty:dft))(Kern, Elise) |
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo, upon Defendant El Toro Plaza LP served on 3/1/2018, answer due 3/22/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition #16 as to Defendant El Toro Plaza LP. (lwag) |
| Filing 17 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #16 filed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 16 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANTS All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo(Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge James V. Selna: Order Granting Plaintiff's MOTION to File First Amended Complaint #14 . (mt) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to file First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo. Motion set for hearing on 2/26/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Craig Cote, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Craig Cote, #3 Proposed Order) (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: Granting Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Initial Complaint #11 , Defendant Plaza El Toro Investors Limited Partnership answer due 1/25/2018. (mt)
|
| Filing 12 Amended STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo.(Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Plaza El Toro Investors Limited Partnership answer now due 1/25/2018, filed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo.(Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo, upon Defendant Plaza El Toro Investors Limited Partnership served on 12/5/2017, answer due 12/26/2017. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge James V. Selna. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/19/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 3/26/2018 at 10:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. (jlen)
|
| Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (jlen) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Plaza El Toro Investors Limited Partnership. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo, identifying PLAZA EL TORO INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Limited Partnership. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-20740202 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Donna Dugo. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party Donna Dugo(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
