Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc. v. Bestore Europe Holding GMBH et al
| Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc. |
| Mist Vapor USA, Inc., Joyetech USA, Inc., Bestore Inc., Bestore Europe Holding GMBH and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 8:2017cv02039 |
| November 21, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 41
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION AGAINST ALL PARTIES WITH PREJUDICE #40 by Judge David O. Carter. (yl)
|
| Filing 40 Joint REQUEST to Dismiss Case (all claims and counterclaims against all parties) filed by Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 39 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (twdb) |
|
Filing 38
ORDER RE: STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION #37 by Judge David O. Carter. It Is Hereby Ordered that Defendants are hereby permanently enjoined from engaging in, committing, or performing, directly or indirectly, any and all of the following conduct: SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 37 Joint STIPULATION for Permanent Injunction filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Permanent Injunction)(Patel, Natu) |
|
Filing 36
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL CASE: The Court, having been notified by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled re Notice of Settlement #35 , hereby orders this action DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court retains jurisdiction for forty-five (45) days to vacate this order and reopen the action upon showing of good cause that the settlement has not been consummated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (dgo)
|
| Filing 35 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Patel, Natu) |
|
Filing 34
PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (See document for further details.) #33 (sbou)
|
| Filing 33 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Protective Order)(Patel, Natu) |
|
Filing 32
SCHEDULING ORDER & ORDER RE: PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES by Judge David O. Carter: Fact Discovery cut-off 11/27/2018, Expert Discovery cut-off 3/1/2019, Initial Reports: 12/27/2018, Rebuttal Reports: 1/26/2019, Motion cut-off 5/6/2019, Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/10/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter, Jury Trial set for 6/25/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
|
Filing 31
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge David O. Carter. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. (dgo)
|
| Filing 30 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge David O. Carter: Scheduling Order to be issued. Court Reporter: CourtSmart; Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Lewman; Plaintiff Attorney: Natu J. Patel, Daniel H. Ngai; Defendant Attorney: Evan William Woolley; Time in Court: :16. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (dgo) |
| Filing 29 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 to 6 days, filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc... (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 28 ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, Counterclaim, #22 with JURY DEMAND filed by Counter-Defendant Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc..(Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 27 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Bestore Europe Holding GMBH, Bestore Inc., Joyetech USA, Inc.. (Woolley, Evan) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting Plaintiff an Extension to File A Response to Defendants' Answer and Counterclaim #25 (mt)
|
| Filing 25 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, Counterclaim, #22 filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Patel, Natu) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 4/30/2018 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Bestore Europe Holding GMBH, Bestore Inc., Joyetech USA, Inc., identifying Joytech USA, Inc., Bestore, Inc., Bestore Europe Holding GMBH, Starbuz Tobacco, Inc., Joyetech Europe Holding GmbH, Bestore International Holding Co. Ltd.. (Woolley, Evan) |
| Filing 22 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 and, COUNTERCLAIM against Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc. filed by Defendants Joyetech USA, Inc., Bestore Europe Holding GMBH, Bestore Inc..(Attorney Evan William Woolley added to party Bestore Europe Holding GMBH(pty:dft))(Woolley, Evan) |
| Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc., upon Defendant Bestore Europe Holding GMBH served on 1/20/2018, answer due 2/12/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lenny Huang, Esq., attorney for Defendant Bestore Europe Holding GMBH, and authorized agent for service of process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Patel, Natu) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days), #19 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: That defendants Joyetech USA, Inc.s and Bestore Inc.s appearance, answer and/or response to plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.s complaint in Case No. 8:17- CV-02039-DOCDFM shall be due on January 29, 2018. (twdb)
|
| Filing 19 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 29, 2018 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Bestore Inc., Joyetech USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Evan William Woolley added to party Bestore Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Evan William Woolley added to party Joyetech USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Woolley, Evan) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc., upon Defendant Mist Vapor USA, Inc. served on 12/7/2017, answer due 12/28/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ed Doss, Clerk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc., upon Defendant Joyetech USA, Inc. served on 12/7/2017, answer due 12/28/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Katie Martin, Wholesale Supervisor in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc., upon Defendant Bestore Inc. served on 11/27/2017, answer due 12/18/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mike Zhang, Chief Operations Officer in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Patel, Natu) |
|
Filing 15
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Bestore Inc. (et) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Mist Vapor USA, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Joyetech USA, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Bestore Europe Holding GMBH. (et) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
| Filing 8 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc., (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Patel, Natu) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-20864808 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7) (Attorney Natu J Patel added to party Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc.(pty:pla))(Patel, Natu) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
