Carmen John Perri v. Verizon Authorized Retailer et al
Plaintiff: Carmen John Perri
Defendant: Does 1-10, Verizon Authorized Retailer and 9432 Garden Grove Blvd, LLC
Case Number: 8:2017cv02115
Filed: December 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2018 Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Manning, Joseph)
February 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT #14 by Judge Cormac J. Carney: The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case vacated and taken off calendar. In light of the Notice of Settlement, the Court further orders the Order to Show Cause #16 issued on January 30, 2018 discharged. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
February 1, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph)
January 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff's counsel, to show cause in writing no later than February 1, 2018, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: (see document for details). (dro)
January 15, 2018 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, upon Defendant 9432 Garden Grove Blvd, LLC served on 1/2/2018, answer due 1/23/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph)
January 15, 2018 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, upon Plaintiff Verizon Authorized Retailer served on 1/8/2018, answer due 1/29/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph)
December 4, 2017 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant 9432 Garden Grove Blvd, LLC. (et)
December 4, 2017 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Verizon Authorized Retailer. (et)
December 4, 2017 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
December 4, 2017 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (et)
December 4, 2017 Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Karen E. Scott. New Case Number 8:17-cv-02115-CJC (KESx). (et)
December 1, 2017 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph)
December 1, 2017 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph)
December 1, 2017 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, identifying VERIZON AUTHORIZED RETAILER, a business form unknown; 9432 GARDEN GROVE BLVD., LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. (Manning, Joseph)
December 1, 2017 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph)
December 1, 2017 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-20907421 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party Carmen John Perri(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carmen John Perri v. Verizon Authorized Retailer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Verizon Authorized Retailer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 9432 Garden Grove Blvd, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carmen John Perri
Represented By: Joseph Richard Manning, Jr
Represented By: Michael John Manning
Represented By: Craig G Cote
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?