James Paul Halpin v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Plaintiff: James Paul Halpin
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2017cv02168
Filed: December 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D. Early
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Guilford
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC., AND ENTIRE CASE 13 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation is GRANTED and the above captioned action is dismissed with prejudice with both parties bearing their respective attorneys fees and costs. (es)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James Paul Halpin v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Paul Halpin
Represented By: Crystal Tammie Innabi
Represented By: Wayne A Sinnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?