Derek Trunk v. David Valentin
Petitioner: Derek Trunk
Respondent: David Valentin
Case Number: 8:2017cv02196
Filed: December 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M. Gee
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Stevenson
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee, Related to: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 1 . Pursuant to the Court's ORDER 12 , filed concurrently herewith, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Derek Trunk v. David Valentin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derek Trunk
Represented By: Alan E Spears
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Valentin
Represented By: Tamara Bogosian
Represented By: Roger Hsieh
Represented By: Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney SA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?