Peter DiMatteo v. Residence Inn by Marriott Anaheim Resort Area et al
Peter DiMatteo |
Does, Island Hospitality Management II, LLC and Residence Inn by Marriott Anaheim Resort Area |
8:2018cv00314 |
February 22, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F. Eick |
Josephine L. Staton |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT, REMOVING CASE FROM ACTIVE CASELOAD, AND FILING OF DISMISSAL 38 by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the case has fully settled. Based thereon, the Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case stayed pending final settlement. It is further ordered that this action is removed from the Courts active caseload. The parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal no later than 5/29/2019. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Counsel is hereby ordered to show cause in writing no later than April 26, 2018, why this case should not be dismi ssed pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41, for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. (see document for details). (dro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.