Togetherbuy.com v. Variant Design Group, LLC et al
| Togetherbuy.com dba Vorsteiner, Inc., Togetherbuy.com and Togetherbuy.com a California Corporation doing business as Vorsteiner, Inc. |
| Variant Design Group, LLC, EMS Distributing LLC, Does 1-10, EMS Distributing LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Element Wheels and Variant Design Group, LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Variant Alloy Wheels |
| 8:2018cv00647 |
| April 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff's counsel, to show cause in writing no later than June 19, 2018, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: (see document for details). (dro)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Togetherbuy.com, upon Defendant EMS Distributing LLC served on 5/24/2018, answer due 6/14/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon EMS Distributing, LLC dba Element Wheels by serving Robert Chang, Registered Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Adams, Michael) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Togetherbuy.com, upon Defendant Variant Design Group, LLC served on 5/6/2018, answer due 5/29/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Variant Design Group, LLC dba Variant Alloy Wheels by serving Robert Chang, Registered Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Adams, Michael) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants EMS Distributing LLC, Variant Design Group, LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (esa) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Togetherbuy.com dba Vorsteiner, Inc.. (Adams, Michael) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Togetherbuy.com dba Vorsteiner, Inc. (Adams, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Togetherbuy.com dba Vorsteiner, Inc., (Adams, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Togetherbuy.com dba Vorsteiner, Inc.. (Adams, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Togetherbuy.com dba Vorsteiner, Inc.. (Adams, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-21618764 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Togetherbuy.com dba Vorsteiner, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Attorney Michael D Adams added to party Togetherbuy.com dba Vorsteiner, Inc.(pty:pla))(Adams, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
