James George Kachavos v. Alexanders Mobility Services, Inc. et al
| James George Kachavos |
| Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Alexanders Mobility Services, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Alexanders Mobility Services, Inc. doing business as Stanley G. Alexander, Inc. |
| 8:2018cv00991 |
| June 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Karen E Scott |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff James George Kachavos, (lh) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Alexanders Mobility Services, Inc.. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Alexanders Mobility Services, Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc..Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Filing Fee $ 400 PAID) Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff James George Kachavos. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of Complaint, #2 Part 3 of Complaint, #3 Part 4 of Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
