Ronald Satish Emrit v. Apple Grove Foster Care Agency
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Apple Grove Foster Care Agency
Case Number: 8:2018cv01031
Filed: June 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E. Scott
Presiding Judge: James V. Selna
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES AND CLOSING CASE 5 by Judge James V. Selna: Plaintiff has failed to submit a timely response. Accordingly, the Request to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees is DENIED and the case is closed. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ronald Satish Emrit v. Apple Grove Foster Care Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Grove Foster Care Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?