Albert Hur v. Hyesung Park et al
| Albert Hur |
| Does and Hyesung Park |
| 8:2018cv01083 |
| June 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| James V. Selna |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge James V. Selna: On October 1, 2019 the plaintiff lodged with the Court "Plaintiff's Request for Additional Time to Properly Effectuate Service of Process" and the clerk's office forwarded to the court a Notice of Document Discrepancies with the request. The Court ordered that the document not be filed but instead rejected and ordered returned to counsel on October 3, 2019. The Court orders this case DISMISSED. Case Terminated. (See document for further details.) Made JS-6. (es)
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTES (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge James V. Selna. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff(s) to Show Cause (OSC) in writing no later than March 15, 2019, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Proof of service of summons and complaint. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (es)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
