In re Arthur Lopez and Cheryl Ann Lopez
| Arthur Lopez and Cheryl Ann Lopez |
| Union Bank |
| Cheryl Ann Lopez |
| Arthur Lopez |
| 8:2018cv01144 |
| June 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John F Walter |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge John F. Walter. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES IN APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT regarding 1) Lack of Jurisdiction: The Notice of Appeal was filed beyond the 14 day time period allowed. 2) Lack of Prosecution by Appellant. Appellant failed to pay the filing fee. Forwarded to Judge John F. Walter. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Appeal Deficiency to Appellant by U.S. Bankruptcy Court. (esa) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 6/27/18. (esa) |
Filing 1
NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION Re: Order Granting Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay entered on 1/30/2012 by Bankruptcy Judge Catherine E. Bauer, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 6/25/18. Bankruptcy Court case number: 8:18-bk-25308 CB, Adversary number: NA, BAP case number: NA., filed by appellant Arthur Lopez. (Attachments: #1 BK Dkt) (esa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
