Nicholas R Lancaster v. Mentor U.S.A., Inc.
| Nicholas R Lancaster |
| Mentor U.S.A., Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 8:2018cv01195 |
| July 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| James V Selna |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Mentor U.S.A., Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Nicholas R Lancaster. Filed in State Court on 6/5/18 Submitted with Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mentor U.S.A., Inc., (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Certificate of Service)(Attorney Brent R Phillips added to party Mentor U.S.A., Inc.(pty:dft))(Phillips, Brent) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mentor U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Certificate of Service)(Phillips, Brent) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the State of California, County of Orange, case number 30-2018-00997352-CU-OE-CXC Receipt No: 0973-22050151 - Fee: $400. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Shayan Davish in Support of Defendant Mentor U.S.A., Inc.'s Notice of Removal, #2 Appendix Certificate of Service) (Attorney Brent R Phillips added to party Mentor U.S.A., Inc.(pty:dft))(Phillips, Brent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
