Mahmoud Razzaghi v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated et al
Mahmoud Razzaghi |
DOES 1-100, inclusive,, UnitedHealth Group, Does 1 through 100, inclusive and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated |
8:2018cv01223 |
July 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Andrew J Guilford |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, UnitedHealth Group. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Mahmoud Razzaghi. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/25/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A PAGE 11 OF 22) (ghap) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Morgan Paige Suder on behalf of Defendant UnitedHealth Group (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Attorney Morgan Paige Suder added to party UnitedHealth Group(pty:dft))(Suder, Morgan) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE-FILED as re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Lyftogt, Marissa) Modified on 7/12/2018 (ghap). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2018-00969328-CU-OE-CJC Receipt No: 0973-22070054 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant UnitedHealth Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notice of interested Parties) (Attorney Marissa L Lyftogt added to party UnitedHealth Group(pty:dft))(Lyftogt, Marissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.