L. Q. Management LLC v. Anthony Maxey et al
L. Q. Management LLC |
Does 1 to 5, Anthony Maxey and Kimberly Turner |
8:2018cv01251 |
July 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Andrew J Guilford |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Mail Returned addressed to Kimberly Turner, 278 North Wilshire Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92801 re Order to Remand Case to State Court #7 . Return to Sender. Insufficient Address. Unable to Forward. (lwag) |
Filing 13 Mail Returned (return to sender unable to forward) addressed to Kimberly Turner re Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), #6 (es) |
Filing 12 Acknowledgment Receipt of CV-103 Letter of Transmittal received July 25, 2018 by L. Edwards (es) |
Filing 11 Mail Returned (return to sender insufficient address) addressed to Kimberly Turner 278 North Wilshire Blvd Anaheim CA 92801 re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 (es) |
Filing 10 Mail Returned (return to sender insufficient address) addressed to Kimberly Turner 278 North Wilshire Blvd Anaheim CA 92801 re Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court (CV-103) - optional html form, #8 (es) |
Filing 9 Mail Returned addressed to Kimberly Turner, 278 North Wilshire Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92801 re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #4 . Return to Sender. Not Deliverable as Addresses. Unable to Forward. (lwag) |
Filing 8 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Orange County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Orange County Superior Court - North Justice Center, Case number: 30-02017-00956267-CL-UD-NJC. (jp) |
Filing 7 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford that this matter be, and hereby is, REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 6 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Andrew J. Guilford that the request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge John D. Early for the following reasons: District Court lacks jurisdiction. IFP Application by Defendant Kimberly Turner. See Order Remanding Case to State Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby REMANDED. (jp) |
RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(mba) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Kimberly Turner. (et) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Kimberly Turner. (et) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA for the County of Orange, North Justice Center, case number 30-02017-00956267-CL-UD-NJC with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Andrew J. Guilford, Discovery to Magistrate Judge John D. Early., filed by Defendant Kimberly Turner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.