Rafael Garcia v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
Plaintiff: Rafael Garcia
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Co. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2018cv01258
Filed: July 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH 28 U.S.C. Section 1446(d) filed by Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co.. (Furuta, Reiko)
July 31, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Rafael Garcia Rafael Garcia, (Malk, Michael)
July 20, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
July 20, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (esa)
July 19, 2018 COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 35)(esa)
July 19, 2018 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Sears, Roebuck and Co., Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Rafael Garcia. (Filed in state court 6/7/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1 p.3) (esa)
July 19, 2018 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Furuta, Reiko)
July 19, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co., identifying 1. Rafael Garcia (Plaintiff) 2. Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Defendant) 3. Sears Holdings Corporation (Parent Company of Sears, Roebuck and Co.). (Furuta, Reiko)
July 19, 2018 Filing 4 DECLARATION of Catherine Miller re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co.. (Furuta, Reiko)
July 19, 2018 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Reiko Furuta re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co.. (Furuta, Reiko)
July 19, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co.. (Furuta, Reiko)
July 19, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Orange, case number 30-2018-00997839 Receipt No: 0973-22117661 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Reiko L Furuta added to party Sears, Roebuck and Co.(pty:dft))(Furuta, Reiko)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rafael Garcia v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rafael Garcia
Represented By: Michael Malk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Represented By: Reiko L Furuta
Represented By: Brian P Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?