Ten-X LLC v. Reily Enterprises, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Brandon Ten-X LLC and Ten-X LLC
Defendant: REILY ENTERPRISES LLC, WILLIAM REILY, Does 1 through 6, inclusive and Reily Enterprises, LLC
Case Number: 8:2018cv01476
Filed: August 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2018 Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to William Reily answer now due 10/24/2018; Reily Enterprises, LLC answer now due 10/24/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants William Reily; Reily Enterprises, LLC.(Attorney Steven C Smith added to party William Reily(pty:dft), Attorney Steven C Smith added to party Reily Enterprises, LLC(pty:dft))(Smith, Steven)
October 3, 2018 Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) #14 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: The correct event was selected Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) However, the incorrect statute was chosen during the docketing sequence. Service of the Complaint was NOT executed pursuant to FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) upon the Clerks Office. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es)
October 2, 2018 Filing 15 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Ten-X LLC, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Proof of Service (Reif, Brandon)
October 2, 2018 Filing 14 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Ten-X LLC, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Proof of Service (Reif, Brandon)
October 1, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint pursuant to 8:1451(b) Returned Executed 60 days, #11 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Service of Summons and Complaint pursuant to 8:1451(b) Returned Executed 60 days, #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed 21 days. Other error(s) with document(s): The defendants are required to file a response to the complaint withing 21 days. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es)
September 28, 2018 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ten-X LLC, upon Defendant Reily Enterprises, LLC served on 9/18/2018, answer due 11/19/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon William Reily, Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Reif, Brandon)
September 28, 2018 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ten-X LLC, upon Defendant William Reily served on 9/17/2018, answer due 11/16/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Preston Cornelius, Son in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Reif, Brandon)
August 22, 2018 Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg)
August 21, 2018 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant William Reily. (car)
August 21, 2018 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Reily Enterprises, LLC. (car)
August 21, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
August 21, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car)
August 20, 2018 Filing 5 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brandon Ten-X LLC, identifying Decade Holdings II, Inc. (Parent corporation of Ten-X, LLC); Decade Holdings I, Inc., (Parent corporation of Decade Holdings II, Inc.); Decade Holding Company, Inc. (Parent corporation of Decade Holdings I, Inc.); and THL Equity Fund VII Investors (Decade), L.P. (Shareholder of Decade Holding Company, Inc.). (Reif, Brandon)
August 20, 2018 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Brandon Ten-X LLC. (Reif, Brandon)
August 20, 2018 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Brandon Ten-X LLC. (Reif, Brandon)
August 20, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brandon Ten-X LLC. (Reif, Brandon)
August 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22284891 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Brandon Ten-X LLC. (Attorney Brandon Scott Reif added to party Brandon Ten-X LLC(pty:pla))(Reif, Brandon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ten-X LLC v. Reily Enterprises, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: REILY ENTERPRISES LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM REILY
Represented By: Steven C Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 6, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reily Enterprises, LLC
Represented By: Steven C Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Ten-X LLC
Represented By: Brandon Scott Reif
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ten-X LLC
Represented By: Brandon Scott Reif
Represented By: Marc S Ehrlich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?