Ten-X LLC v. Reily Enterprises, LLC et al
Brandon Ten-X LLC and Ten-X LLC |
REILY ENTERPRISES LLC, WILLIAM REILY, Does 1 through 6, inclusive and Reily Enterprises, LLC |
8:2018cv01476 |
August 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Douglas F McCormick |
Josephine L Staton |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to William Reily answer now due 10/24/2018; Reily Enterprises, LLC answer now due 10/24/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants William Reily; Reily Enterprises, LLC.(Attorney Steven C Smith added to party William Reily(pty:dft), Attorney Steven C Smith added to party Reily Enterprises, LLC(pty:dft))(Smith, Steven) |
Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) #14 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: The correct event was selected Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) However, the incorrect statute was chosen during the docketing sequence. Service of the Complaint was NOT executed pursuant to FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) upon the Clerks Office. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
Filing 15 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Ten-X LLC, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Proof of Service (Reif, Brandon) |
Filing 14 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Ten-X LLC, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Proof of Service (Reif, Brandon) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint pursuant to 8:1451(b) Returned Executed 60 days, #11 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Service of Summons and Complaint pursuant to 8:1451(b) Returned Executed 60 days, #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed 21 days. Other error(s) with document(s): The defendants are required to file a response to the complaint withing 21 days. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ten-X LLC, upon Defendant Reily Enterprises, LLC served on 9/18/2018, answer due 11/19/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon William Reily, Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Reif, Brandon) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ten-X LLC, upon Defendant William Reily served on 9/17/2018, answer due 11/16/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Preston Cornelius, Son in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Reif, Brandon) |
Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant William Reily. (car) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Reily Enterprises, LLC. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
Filing 5 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brandon Ten-X LLC, identifying Decade Holdings II, Inc. (Parent corporation of Ten-X, LLC); Decade Holdings I, Inc., (Parent corporation of Decade Holdings II, Inc.); Decade Holding Company, Inc. (Parent corporation of Decade Holdings I, Inc.); and THL Equity Fund VII Investors (Decade), L.P. (Shareholder of Decade Holding Company, Inc.). (Reif, Brandon) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Brandon Ten-X LLC. (Reif, Brandon) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Brandon Ten-X LLC. (Reif, Brandon) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brandon Ten-X LLC. (Reif, Brandon) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22284891 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Brandon Ten-X LLC. (Attorney Brandon Scott Reif added to party Brandon Ten-X LLC(pty:pla))(Reif, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.