Prince Lionheart Inc v. Haspi Products LLC
Plaintiff: Prince Lionheart Inc
Defendant: Haspi Products LLC
Case Number: 8:2018cv01507
Filed: August 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2018 Filing 13 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 order) (twdb)
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re Stipulated Dismissal by Judge David O. Carter #11 . As no defendants remain in the action, the action is hereby dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb)
September 20, 2018 Filing 11 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41 filed by plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Stipulated Dismissal-ORDER)(Gatien, Konrad)
August 30, 2018 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc, upon Defendant Haspi Products LLC served on 8/28/2018, answer due 9/18/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jo N. of Legalzoom.com, Inc., agent for service of process, in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gatien, Konrad)
August 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
August 27, 2018 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Haspi Products LLC. (esa)
August 27, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
August 27, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (esa)
August 24, 2018 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Prince Lionheart Inc. (Gatien, Konrad)
August 24, 2018 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc, identifying Prince Lionheart Inc.. (Gatien, Konrad)
August 24, 2018 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc. (Gatien, Konrad)
August 24, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc. (Gatien, Konrad)
August 24, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22311783 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint-EXHIBITS 1-3) (Attorney Konrad Karl Gatien added to party Prince Lionheart Inc(pty:pla))(Gatien, Konrad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prince Lionheart Inc v. Haspi Products LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Haspi Products LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prince Lionheart Inc
Represented By: Konrad Karl Gatien
Represented By: Anthony M Keats
Represented By: Matthew Errett Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?