Prince Lionheart Inc v. Haspi Products LLC
Prince Lionheart Inc |
Haspi Products LLC |
8:2018cv01507 |
August 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Douglas F McCormick |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 order) (twdb) |
Filing 12 ORDER re Stipulated Dismissal by Judge David O. Carter #11 . As no defendants remain in the action, the action is hereby dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41 filed by plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Stipulated Dismissal-ORDER)(Gatien, Konrad) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc, upon Defendant Haspi Products LLC served on 8/28/2018, answer due 9/18/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jo N. of Legalzoom.com, Inc., agent for service of process, in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Gatien, Konrad) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Haspi Products LLC. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (esa) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Prince Lionheart Inc. (Gatien, Konrad) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc, identifying Prince Lionheart Inc.. (Gatien, Konrad) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc. (Gatien, Konrad) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc. (Gatien, Konrad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22311783 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Prince Lionheart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint-EXHIBITS 1-3) (Attorney Konrad Karl Gatien added to party Prince Lionheart Inc(pty:pla))(Gatien, Konrad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Prince Lionheart Inc v. Haspi Products LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Haspi Products LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Prince Lionheart Inc | |
Represented By: | Konrad Karl Gatien |
Represented By: | Anthony M Keats |
Represented By: | Matthew Errett Graham |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.