Sean P. Harper v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. et al
| Sean P Harper |
| Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. and Does 1 through 20 inclusive |
| 8:2018cv01564 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 INITIAL DISCLOSURE of Initial Rule 26 filed by Plaintiff Sean P Harper (Tukhi, Faheem) |
| Filing 23 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court #17 filed by Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.. (Rodriguez, Maria) |
Filing 22
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No. 2 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Case is ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than July 26, 2019. (tg)
|
| Filing 21 CIVIL TRIAL ORDER for cases assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. (tg) |
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for hearing October 26, 2018, is VACATED and taken off calendar, and the following dates are set. Counsel's attention is directed to the Court's Civil Trial Order filed concurrently with this Minute Order. Generally, motions should be set for hearing on the Court's first available date. Finally, the dates below have been adjusted in accordance with the Order Setting Scheduling Conference and will not be continued absent a showing of good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) (4). *See order for further details.* (es)
|
| Filing 19 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The hearing on the Motion to Remand #17 is now set for 11/16/2018 at 10:30 a.m. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 18 JOINT REPORT of RULE 26 (F) AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates)(Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court filed by SEAN P. HARPER Sean P Harper. Motion set for hearing on 11/16/2018 at 02:30 PM before Judge Josephine L. Staton. (Tukhi, Faheem) |
|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A NOTICE OF MOTION RE: MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Josephine L. Staton: In order to allow full briefing of this issue, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Notice of Motion within five (5) days of entry of this Order, setting his Motion to Remand for hearing on one of the Court's available hearing dates. Briefing shall thereafter proceed in accordance with Local Rules 7-9 and 7-10. (es)
|
| Filing 15 [Notice of motion and Motion to Remand Civil Action to Superior Court Pursuant 28 U.S.C. Section 1447(c); filed as RESPONSE IN SUPPORT MOTION TO REMAND CIVIL ACTION filed by Plaintiff Sean P Harper. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Tukhi, Faheem) Modified on 9/17/2018 (es). |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #13 (Rodriguez, Maria) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: REMAND FOR UNTIMELY REMOVAL by Judge Josephine L. Staton Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause whether he intends to waive any objection to the timeliness of removal. Plaintiff's response should be filed within five (5) days of entry of this Order. (es)
|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc., re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Intradistrict Transfer - Clerical Error (G-73) - optional html form, #6 , Declaration #3 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #8 , Notice (Other), #11 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #9 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #7 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #10 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #5 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on September 6, 2018. (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE filed by defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH U.S.C. 1446(d) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice to the Clerk of the Superior Court, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice to Adverse Parties)(Rodriguez, Maria) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference is set for 10/26/2018 at 1:30 p.m. See document for details. (tg)
|
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to John D. Early. New Case Number 8:18-cv-01564-JLS-JDEx. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Sean P Harper, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Marjorie C. Soto, Attorney for Defendant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. Filed in State Court on 8/14/18 Submitted with attachment H to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. Filed in State Court on 8/24/18 Submitted with Exhibit C to Notice of Removal #1 .(car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Summons and Complaint returned Executed by Plaintiff Sean P Harper, upon Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 7/17/2018. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Marjorie C. Soto, Attorney for Defendant. Submitted with Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Sean P Harper. Filed in State Court on 7/9/18 Submitted with Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. (Soto, Marjorie) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc., identifying 1. Sean P. Harper (Plaintiff) 2. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. (Defendant). (Soto, Marjorie) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Rebecca Adkins re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.. (Soto, Marjorie) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.. (Soto, Marjorie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Orange, case number 30-2018-01004263 Receipt No: 0973-22338697 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.. (Attorney Marjorie Clara Soto added to party Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.(pty:dft))(Soto, Marjorie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
