NST Global, LLC v. Strike Industries et al
Plaintiff: NST Global, LLC and NST Global, LLC doing business as SB Tactical
Defendant: Strike Industries and Garrett Keller
Case Number: 8:2018cv01664
Filed: September 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: James V Selna
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2018 Filing 26 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brittney Paige Baker to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff NST Global, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22717778) filed by Plaintiff NST Global, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brees, William)
November 8, 2018 Filing 25 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jason M. Ellison to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff NST Global, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22717564) filed by Plaintiff NST Global, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brees, William)
November 5, 2018 Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff NST Global, LLC, upon Defendant Strike Industries served on 9/28/2018, answer due 10/25/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Garrett Keller, Corporate Secretary in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Maxey-Fisher, Brittany)
November 5, 2018 Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff NST Global, LLC, upon Defendant Garrett Keller served on 10/4/2018, answer due 10/25/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Garrett Keller in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Maxey-Fisher, Brittany)
November 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for 12/17/2018 at 11:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. The parties shall file their JOINT Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by 12/10/2018. (kt)
October 25, 2018 Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendants Garrett Keller, Strike Industries, identifying none. (Lee, Jen-Feng)
October 25, 2018 Filing 20 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against NST Global, LLC filed by defendants Garrett Keller, Strike Industries.(Lee, Jen-Feng)
October 17, 2018 Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Garrett Keller answer now due 10/25/2018; Strike Industries answer now due 10/25/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by defendants Garrett Keller; Strike Industries.(Lee, Jen-Feng)
October 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge James V. Selna: granting #16 Non-Resident Attorney Andy M Han APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Garrett Keller, Strike Industries, designating Jen-Fen Lee as local counsel. (jp)
October 10, 2018 Filing 17 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (jlen)
October 5, 2018 Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Andy M. Han to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Garrett Keller, Strike Industries (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22534819) filed by defendants Garrett Keller, Strike Industries. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lee, Jen-Feng)
October 5, 2018 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jen-Feng Lee on behalf of Defendants Garrett Keller, Strike Industries (Attorney Jen-Feng Lee added to party Garrett Keller(pty:dft), Attorney Jen-Feng Lee added to party Strike Industries(pty:dft))(Lee, Jen-Feng)
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, GRANTING #12 Non-Resident Attorney William R. Brees APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff NST GLOBAL, LLC d/b/a/ SB TACTICAL, designating Samuel E. Cooley as local counsel. (es)
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, GRANTING #11 Non-Resident Attorney Brittany J. Maxey-Fisher APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff NST GLOBAL, LLC d/b/a/ SB TACTICAL, designating Samuel E. Cooley as local counsel. (es)
September 19, 2018 Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney William R. Brees to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff NST Global, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22443830) filed by Plaintiff NST Global, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cooley, Samuel)
September 19, 2018 Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brittany J. Maxey-Fisher to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff NST Global, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 9/18/2018, Receipt No. 26CB0CHR) filed by Plaintiff NST Global, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Cooley, Samuel)
September 14, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney William R Brees. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
September 14, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Brittany J Maxey-Fisher. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et)
September 14, 2018 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Garrett Keller, Strike Industries. (et)
September 14, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
September 14, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et)
September 13, 2018 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff NST Global, LLC. (Cooley, Samuel)
September 13, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff NST Global, LLC, (Cooley, Samuel)
September 13, 2018 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by NST Global, LLC. (Cooley, Samuel)
September 13, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff NST Global, LLC. (Cooley, Samuel)
September 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22419029 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff NST Global, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D) (Attorney Samuel E Cooley added to party NST Global, LLC(pty:pla))(Cooley, Samuel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NST Global, LLC v. Strike Industries et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Strike Industries
Represented By: Jen-Feng Lee
Represented By: Andy M Han
Represented By: Kenneth K Tanji, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Garrett Keller
Represented By: Jen-Feng Lee
Represented By: Andy M Han
Represented By: Kenneth K Tanji, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NST Global, LLC
Represented By: Samuel E Cooley
Represented By: William R Brees
Represented By: Brittany J Maxey-Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NST Global, LLC doing business as SB Tactical
Represented By: Samuel E Cooley
Represented By: William R Brees
Represented By: Brittany J Maxey-Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?