Linda Marie Ketter v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Linda Marie Ketter |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 8:2018cv01673 |
| September 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attorney Francesco P Benavides added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Benavides, Francesco) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Linda Marie Ketter, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to mailroom. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to E. Anderson. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to R. Oliver. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 summons executed with electronic receipt)(Ortega, Omar) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA #8 by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by as soon as possible. (kl) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page is missing. R. 11-3.2 Paper. All documents shall be formatted for 8 x 11 inch paper, and shall be numbered on the left margin with not more than 28 lines per page In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (kl) |
| Filing 8 ***STRICKEN PER ORDER #10 ***PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Linda Marie Ketter, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/20/2018, answer due 11/19/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to mailroom. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to E. Anderson. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to R. Oliver. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Ortega, Omar) Modified on 9/27/2018 (kl). |
Filing 7
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [Social Security] by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. THE COURT'S CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER HAS BEEN REVISED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2016. PLEASE REVIEW THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. In accordance with General Order 05-01, this case is designated for electronic filing. A chambers copy is required only for the joint stipulation and the certified administrative record. In order to facilitate the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this case, the parties shall comply with the following instructions: (see order for further details). (hr)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Linda Marie Ketter, (Ortega, Omar) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Linda Marie Ketter. (Ortega, Omar) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Linda Marie Ketter. (Ortega, Omar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22424501 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Linda Marie Ketter. (Attorney Omar Ortega added to party Linda Marie Ketter(pty:pla))(Ortega, Omar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Linda Marie Ketter v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney SA-CV |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Francesco P Benavides |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Linda Marie Ketter | |
| Represented By: | Omar Ortega |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
