Zubin Navani v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff: Zubin Navani
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Case Number: 8:2018cv01676
Filed: September 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andrew J Guilford
Referring Judge: Autumn D Spaeth
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2018 Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC answer now due 11/6/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC.(Attorney Nathan Andrew Searles added to party Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC(pty:dft))(Searles, Nathan)
September 28, 2018 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Zubin Navani, upon Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC served on 9/25/2018, answer due 10/16/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Becky DeGeorge, authorized agent for service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Wagner, Elizabeth)
September 18, 2018 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC. (es)
September 17, 2018 Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Zubin Navani. (Loker, Matthew)
September 17, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car)
September 17, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
September 17, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car)
September 14, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Zubin Navani, (Loker, Matthew)
September 14, 2018 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Zubin Navani. (Loker, Matthew)
September 14, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Zubin Navani. (Loker, Matthew)
September 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22427470 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Zubin Navani. (Attorney Matthew M Loker added to party Zubin Navani(pty:pla))(Loker, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zubin Navani v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zubin Navani
Represented By: Matthew M Loker
Represented By: Seyed Abbas Kazerounian
Represented By: Elizabeth Ann Wagner
Represented By: Joshua B Swigart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Represented By: Nathan Andrew Searles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?