Carol Elaine Wassmann v. South Orange County Community College District et al
Carol Elaine Wassmann |
Robert Brumucci, Katherine Schmeidler, Glenn Roquemore, Karima Feldhus, South Orange County Community College District and Lewis Long |
8:2018cv01823 |
October 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andrew J Guilford |
Douglas F McCormick |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Denying Plaintiff's Request to Waive Fees for Copies(Dkt. 37) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: Plaintiff has filed a "Request to Waive Fees for Copies." Dkt. 37. She requests copies of every document filed in this case since inception. See id. at 4. Plaintiffs request is DENIED. Her case was dismissed with prejudice over a year ago. *See order for details.* (es) |
Filing 38 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF MATTER to the Magistrate Judge. REQUEST for Order for Copies, #37 is referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for ruling. (shb) |
Filing 37 REQUEST to Waive Fees for Copies filed by plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. (es) |
Filing 36 MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (DKT. NO. 29, 35.) by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: This matter is appropriate for resolution without a hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 78(b). The Court VACATES the November 25, 2019 hearing. This matter is appropriate for resolution without a hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 78(b). The Court VACATES the November 25, 2019 hearing. (See document for further details.) (es) |
Filing 35 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION Opposition Too Deny African American Woman for Relief From Judgment Rule 60 filed by plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. Motion set for hearing on 11/25/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (es) |
Filing 34 Opposition in opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order #29 filed by Defendant South Orange County Community College District. (Walsh, Dennis) |
Filing 33 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann, re Memorandum in Support of Motion #30 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Relief #29 , Exhibit to Motion #31 , Declaration (Motion related) #32 served on 10/28/2019. (es) |
Filing 32 DECLARATION in Support of Motion for Carol Elaine Wassmann request for Relief From Judgment (Rule 60) #29 filed by Plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. (es) |
Filing 31 Exhibit List and Exhibits (A too I) Request for Relief From Judgment Rule 60 #29 filed by Plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. (es) |
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES in Support of Plaintiff's Relief From Judgment Rule 60 #29 filed by Plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. (es) |
Filing 29 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Plaintiff's Request for Relief from Judgment Rule 60 filed by plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. Motion set for hearing on 11/25/2019 at 9:30 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (es) |
Filing 28 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, the Court enters Judgment against plaintiff in favor of all Defendants. #27 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es) |
Filing 27 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: This matter is appropriate for resolution without a hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 78(b). The Court thus VACATES the June 3, 2019 hearing. The Court GRANTS the District's motion without leave to amend. The Court also dismisses Plaintiffs complaints against the remaining Defendants under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B) without leave to amend. The Court will enter a simple judgment. (See document for further details.) (es) |
Filing 26 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant South Orange County Community College District.. (Walsh, Dennis) |
Filing 25 REPLY in support First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #18 filed by Defendant South Orange County Community College District. (Walsh, Dennis) |
Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann, re Declaration #23 , MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion #22 served on 5/13/19. (es) |
Filing 23 DECLARATION in Support of Opposition to Motion to Dismiss #22 filed by Plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. (es) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Opposition to First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #18 filed by Plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. (es) |
Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant South Orange County Community College District, identifying Unserved named defendant Karima Feldhus, Unserved named defendant Robert Brumucci, Unserved named defendant Glenn Roquemore, Unserved named defendant Lewis Long, Unserved named defendant Katherine Schmeidler. (Walsh, Dennis) |
Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
Filing 19 ORDER REGARDING EARLY MEETING OF PARTIES AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Scheduling Conference set for 6/3/2019 at 9:00 a.m. (mku) |
Filing 18 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant South Orange County Community College District. Motion set for hearing on 6/3/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order RE: DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT, #2 DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT, #3 Proposed Order RE DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT) (Attorney Dennis J Walsh added to party South Orange County Community College District(pty:dft)) (Walsh, Dennis) |
Filing 17 PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN (USM-285) of summons and Complaint - (Discovery),, #1 upon South Orange County Community College District served on 4/5/2019, answer due 4/26/2019, served by personal service, by Federal statute, upon Michelle Odo, Executive Assistant. Remarks: DUSMS: 1; hours for all DUSMS: 1; round trip miles for all vehicles: 34 miles. (es) |
Filing 16 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL by Judge Andrew J. Guilford (es) |
Filing 15 ORDER RE: SERVICE OF PROCESS BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (es) |
Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR SERVICE (DKT. NO. #11 .) by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Plaintiff requested U.S. Marshal Service to serve the named defendants in her suit. (Dkt. No. 11.) The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request as it applies to Defendant South Orange County Community College District only. The Court will consider the issue as to the other defendants after it reviews the response of the South Orange County Community College District to the complaint. (es) |
Filing 13 MINUTES OF EARLY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Cause is called for hearing. Plaintiff in pro se only party present. The Court and plaintiff confer. The request for Marshal service is taken under submission. Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (es) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER [IN CHAMBER] ORDER FOR EARLY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: The Court ORDERS that this hearing take place on December 10, 2018, at 9:00 AM. See order for further details. (es) |
Filing 11 (AMENDED) REQUEST for Order for U.S. Marshal Service too Serve Summons filed by plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (es) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery),, #1 as to All Defendants. (sbou) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (sbou) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (ghap) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. (ghap) |
Filing 5 EXHIBITS filed by Plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. as to Complaint - (Discovery) #1 . (ghap) |
Filing 4 VERIFICATION of Carol Elaine Wassmann (In Pro Per) filed by plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. (ghap) Modified on 10/16/2018 (ghap). |
Filing 3 REQUEST too Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. No Lodged Proposed Order. (ghap) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. (ghap) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Robert Brumucci, Karima Feldhus, Lewis Long, Glenn Roquemore, Katherine Schmeidler, South Orange County Community College District.Case assigned to Judge Andrew J. Guilford for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick.Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Carol Elaine Wassmann. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets) (ghap) Modified on 10/16/2018 (ghap). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/16/2018: #2 Summons) (ghap). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.