Chende LLC et al v. Impressions Vanity Co.
| Guangzhou Tuodian Trade Co., Ltd. and Chende LLC |
| Impressions Vanity Co. |
| 8:2018cv01862 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| John D Early |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Notice) (twdb) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiffs Chende LLC, Guangzhou Tuodian Trade Co., Ltd., re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #12 served on November 21, 2018. (Brown, Nicholas) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs Chende LLC, Guangzhou Tuodian Trade Co., Ltd.. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Brown, Nicholas) |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTIONby Judge David O. Carter: The Court hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than November 19, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following as an appropriate response to this OSC if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently (See minutes for further details) (yl)
|
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chende LLC, Guangzhou Tuodian Trade Co., Ltd., upon Defendant Impressions Vanity Co. served on 10/19/2018, answer due 11/9/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Lien, Director of Operations in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Brown, Nicholas) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Impressions Vanity Co. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Chende LLC, Guangzhou Tuodian Trade Co., Ltd.. (Brown, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Chende LLC, Guangzhou Tuodian Trade Co., Ltd., (Brown, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Chende LLC, Guangzhou Tuodian Trade Co., Ltd.. (Brown, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Chende LLC, Guangzhou Tuodian Trade Co., Ltd.. (Brown, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22595817 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Chende LLC, Guangzhou Tuodian Trade Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Nicholas A Brown added to party Chende LLC(pty:pla), Attorney Nicholas A Brown added to party Guangzhou Tuodian Trade Co., Ltd.(pty:pla))(Brown, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
