Nehemiah Kong v. In Sik Shin et al
| Nehemiah Kong |
| In Sik Shin, Does 1-10 and In Sook Shin |
| 8:2018cv01885 |
| October 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tg) |
| Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 as to Defendants In Sook Shin, In Sik Shin. (car) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 10/19/18, receipt number 0973-22606045), filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong.(Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 1 [CIVIL COVER SHEET] FILED AS COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22606045 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Nehemiah Kong(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) Modified on 10/19/2018 (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
