Rafael Arroyo Jr. v. Vesela Kennepohl, et al
| Rafael Arroyo Jr. and Rafael Arroyo, Jr. |
| The Hertz Corporation, Vesela Kennepohl and Does 1-10 |
| 8:2018cv01990 |
| November 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Vesela Kennepohl answer now due 1/10/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Vesela Kennepohl.(Attorney Robert W Beck added to party Vesela Kennepohl(pty:dft))(Beck, Robert) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Hertz Corporation answer now due 1/9/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Hertz Corporation.(Ciolino, Barbara) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Hertz Corporation, identifying Rental Car Intermediate Holdings, LLC. (Ciolino, Barbara) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Barbara Ciolino counsel for Defendant The Hertz Corporation. Adding Barbara Ciolino as counsel of record for Defendant The Hertz Corporation, a Delaware Corporation for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant The Hertz Corporation, a Delaware Corporation. (Attorney Barbara Ciolino added to party The Hertz Corporation(pty:dft))(Ciolino, Barbara) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr, upon Defendant Vesela Kennepohl served on 11/20/2018, answer due 12/11/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Vesela, Kennepohl, in individual and representative capacity as trustee of the Kennepohl Trust Dated May 7, 1990 in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr, upon Defendant The Hertz Corporation served on 11/19/2018, answer due 12/10/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: C T CORPORATION SYSTEM - Albert Doe (Intake Specialist) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Vesela Kennepohl, The Hertz Corporation. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo Jr.. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo Jr., (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo Jr.. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22705467 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo Jr.. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Rafael Arroyo Jr.(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
