Chris Parker v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
| Chris Parker |
| Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC |
| 8:2018cv02103 |
| November 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| James V Selna |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (jlen) |
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Chris R. Miltenberger to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Chris Parker, designating Jonathan A. Stieglitz as local counsel #9 . (iv)
|
| Filing 12 Notice of Electronic Filing re Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #10 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #11 e-mailed to Chris Miltenberger bounced due to invalid email address. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrey) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, identifying PRA Group, Inc.. (Lohr, Jessica) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC.(Attorney Jessica Rose Ellis Lohr added to party Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC(pty:dft))(Lohr, Jessica) |
| Filing 9 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Chris Miltenberger to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Chris Parker (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22847595) filed by plaintiff Chris Parker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Chris R Miltenberger. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption on the document uploaded to the docket entry number referenced above does not match the case information on the docket (e.g., case title, case number, document name, etc.). The Court may 1)order an amended or corrected document to be filed, 2)order the document stricken, or 3)take other action the Court deems appropriate. You may file a Notice of Errata attaching a corrected version of the document, but you are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chris Parker, (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chris Parker. (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22803444 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Chris Parker. (Attorney Jonathan Aaron Stieglitz added to party Chris Parker(pty:pla))(Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chris Parker v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chris Parker | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Aaron Stieglitz |
| Represented By: | Chris R Miltenberger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jessica Rose Ellis Lohr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
