Travis Lewis v. Credico,Inc.
| Travis C. Lewis |
| Credico,Inc. and Credico,Inc. doing business as Credit Collections Bureau |
| 8:2018cv02127 |
| November 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 8:18-cv-02127 JLS(ADSx). (rn) |
| Filing 11 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Credico,Inc.. (Kaminski, David) |
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Credico,Inc. answer now due 2/8/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Credico,Inc..(Attorney David J Kaminski added to party Credico,Inc. (pty:dft))(Kaminski, David) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Travis C. Lewis, upon Defendant Credico,Inc. served on 12/28/2018, answer due 1/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Megan Wehrkamp- Inside Client Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: granting #7 Non-Resident Attorney Nathan C. Vollheim APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Travis C. Lewis, designating Nicholas M. Wajda as local counsel. (sbou)
|
| Filing 7 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Nathan Charles Volheim to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Travis C. Lewis (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22844079) filed by Nathan C. Volheim Travis C. Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Subpoena Request (AO 88) #2 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Complaint. It should have been filed and entered separately under its proper event. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs Other error(s) with document(s): Subpoena Request (AO 88) wrong event, correct event Summons Request. (et) |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Credico,Inc. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (Attachments: #1 CV11- Statement of Consent) (et) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Travis C. Lewis, (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Subpoena filed by Plaintiff Travis C. Lewis. (Wajda, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22822644 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Travis C. Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Nicholas M Wajda added to party Travis C. Lewis(pty:pla))(Wajda, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
