Matthew Verdiglione v. Classic Resto Mods, LLC et al
Matthew Verdiglione |
Jason Britton's No Limit Motorsports, Classic Resto Mods, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive and Jason Brittons No Limit Motorsports |
8:2018cv02240 |
December 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Josephine L Staton |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Defendant Classic Resto Mods, LLC, Jason Brittons No Limit Motorsports. (Chang, Hyunsuk) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jason Brittons No Limit Motorsports answer now due 2/15/2019; Classic Resto Mods, LLC answer now due 2/15/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Jason Brittons No Limit Motorsports; Classic Resto Mods, LLC.(Attorney Hyunsuk A Chang added to party Classic Resto Mods, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Hyunsuk A Chang added to party Jason Brittons No Limit Motorsports(pty:dft))(Chang, Hyunsuk) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Verdiglione, upon Defendant Jason Brittons No Limit Motorsports served on 12/27/2018, answer due 1/17/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Fason Britton's No Limit Motorsports by Ramsey Braud, Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Matthew Verdiglione, upon Defendant Classic Resto Mods, LLC served on 12/27/2018, answer due 1/17/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Classic Resto Mods, LLC by R Scott Tedro, Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tg) |
Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg) |
Filing 9 21 DAYS Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Classic Resto Mods, LLC, Jason Brittons No Limit Motorsports. (jp) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #7 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Matthew Verdiglione. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Matthew Verdiglione. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Matthew Verdiglione, (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Matthew Verdiglione. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22916032 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Matthew Verdiglione. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Matthew Verdiglione(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.