Christopher Coppi v. Siemens Industry, Inc.et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Coppi
Defendant: Siemens Industry, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Case Number: 8:2018cv02255
Filed: December 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No. 3 by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Case is ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than March 27, 2020. (tg)
February 13, 2019 Filing 15 CIVIL TRIAL ORDER for cases assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton. (tg)
February 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE (In Chambers) SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for hearing 2/15/2019, is VACATED and taken off calendar, and the following dates are set. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/29/2020 at 10:30 AM. See document for further information. (jp)
January 31, 2019 Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc... (Bodaghi, Pejmon)
January 4, 2019 CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/20/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED NO. 1 TO SUPPLEMENT #12 ). (jp)
January 4, 2019 Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Conformed Answer to Complaint by Siemens Industry, Inc.)(Bodaghi, Pejmon)
January 3, 2019 Filing 11 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by plaintiff Christopher Coppi.. (Lovretovich, Joseph)
December 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference is set for 2/15/2019 at 10:30 a.m. See document for details. (tg)
December 27, 2018 Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg)
December 21, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
December 21, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et)
December 20, 2018 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF CHRISTOPHER COPPI'S COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO. 3 #1 .(et)
December 20, 2018 CONFORMED ELECTRONICALLY FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Siemens Industry, Inc., Does 1 through 25, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Christopher Coppi. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/9/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 #1 . (et)
December 20, 2018 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc. identifying Siemens, A.G. as Corporate Parent. (Bodaghi, Pejmon)
December 20, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc.. (Bodaghi, Pejmon)
December 20, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc., identifying Plaintiff Christopher Coppi, Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc. and Siemens Corporation. (Bodaghi, Pejmon)
December 20, 2018 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Claire Horita re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc.. (Bodaghi, Pejmon)
December 20, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc.. (Bodaghi, Pejmon)
December 20, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2018-01031401-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: 0973-22933097 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Siemens Industry, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Dec of Bodaghi ISO Removal, #2 Exhibit Ex A to Dec of Bodaghi ISO REMOVAL, #3 Exhibit Ex B to Dec of Bodaghi ISO REMOVAL, #4 Exhibit Ex C to Dec of Bodaghi ISO REMOVAL, #5 Exhibit Ex D to Dec of Bodaghi ISO REMOVAL, #6 Exhibit Ex E to Dec of Bodaghi ISO REMOVAL, #7 Exhibit Ex F to Dec of Bodaghi ISO REMOVAL) (Attorney Pejmon Dustin Bodaghi added to party Siemens Industry, Inc.(pty:dft))(Bodaghi, Pejmon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christopher Coppi v. Siemens Industry, Inc.et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Siemens Industry, Inc.
Represented By: Pejmon Dustin Bodaghi
Represented By: Gregory G Iskander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Coppi
Represented By: Nicholas W Sarris
Represented By: Joseph M Lovretovich
Represented By: Stephen James Wiard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?