Kenneth Perez v. Medicredit, Inc.
Kenneth Perez |
Medicredit, Inc. |
8:2019cv00114 |
January 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
James V Selna |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Medicredit, Inc., (Henry, Amber) |
Filing 12 DECLARATION of Amber Henry In support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Or in the Alternative Quash Service #11 filed by Defendant Medicredit, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Henry, Amber) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Or in the Alternative Quash Service filed by Defendant Medicredit, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 4/15/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (Attorney Amber D Henry added to party Medicredit, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Henry, Amber) |
Filing 10 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 4/22/2019 at 11:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file their Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with a completed Exhibit A, by 4/15/2019. (kt) |
Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (jlen) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Medicredit, Inc.. (es) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, GRANTING #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (es) |
Filing 6 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 16-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:18-cv-02283-JVS-JDEx. Case referred from Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Magistrate Judge John D. Early for DISCOVERY. The case number will now read as follows: SACV 19-00114-JVS (JDEx). Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (dv) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (ghap) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Perez. (ghap) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Kenneth Perez. (ghap) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Medicredit, Inc. Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Kenneth Perez. (Attachments: #1 CV-71, #2 Summons) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kenneth Perez v. Medicredit, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kenneth Perez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Medicredit, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Amber D Henry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.