Pedro Cortes v. Monsanto Company et al
Pedro Cortes |
Monsanto Company, Monsanto Production Supply LLC, Bayer AG, Does 1 through 100, Inclusive, Bayer Corporation and Bayer US |
8:2019cv00117 |
January 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
James V Selna |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for 4/22/2019 at 11:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file their Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with a completed Exhibit A, by 4/15/2019. (kt) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Monsanto Company, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #12 served on 02/04/2019. (Platt, Steven) |
Filing 12 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (jlen) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Monsanto Company, re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #7 served on 01/23/2019. (Platt, Steven) |
Filing 10 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Pedro Cortes.. (Yeremenko, Vadim) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND Monsanto Company's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Monsanto Company.(Platt, Steven) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer US, Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Monsanto Company, Monsanto Production Supply LLC, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Pedro Cortes. (Filed in state court 11/27/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Richard A Clark counsel for Defendant Monsanto Company. Adding Richard A Clark as counsel of record for Monsanto Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Monsanto Company. (Attorney Richard A Clark added to party Monsanto Company(pty:dft))(Clark, Richard) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Steven Robert Platt counsel for Defendant Monsanto Company. Adding Steven R. Platt as counsel of record for Monsanto Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Monsanto Company. (Platt, Steven) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Monsanto Company identifying Bayer AG as Corporate Parent. (Platt, Steven) |
Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Monsanto Company, identifying Bayer AG. (Platt, Steven) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Monsanto Company. (Platt, Steven) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2018-01034782 Receipt No: 0973-23079244 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Monsanto Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Superior Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 Superior Court Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 Superior Court Summons, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 Superior Court E-Filing Transaction Receipt, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 Superior Court Notice of Case Assignment, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6 Case Management Conference Notice, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7 Revised Case Management Conference Notice, #8 Proof of Service) (Attorney Steven Robert Platt added to party Monsanto Company(pty:dft))(Platt, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.