Shawn Newgaard v. Pete Woodworth et al
Plaintiff: Shawn Newgaard
Defendant: Pete Woodworth, All Other Tenants in Possession and Does 1 to 10
Case Number: 8:2019cv00236
Filed: February 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2019 Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, County of Orange. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, County of Orange. (es)
February 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter be, and hereby is, REMANDED to the Superior Court of California listed above, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (es)
February 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, DENYING #3 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: This case is hereby REMANDED to state court. (es)
February 11, 2019 RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Re APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(jdo)
February 6, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
February 6, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car)
February 6, 2019 Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Defendant Pete Woodworth. (car)
February 6, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Pete Woodworth (car)
February 6, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA County of Orange, case number 30-02018-01035273-CL-UD-CJC with Conformed copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, filed by Defendant Pete Woodworth. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shawn Newgaard v. Pete Woodworth et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pete Woodworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: All Other Tenants in Possession
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Newgaard
Represented By: Christopher Markelz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?