Curtis Chip Loeb v. Ultimate Franchises, Inc. et al
| Curtis Loeb and Chip Loeb |
| DOES 1 through 20, unknown individuals and entities, Loretta Hwong Griffiths, Ultimate Franchises, Inc., Ultimate Brands, Inc., W. Scott Griffiths, Ron Love, Brigitte Love Thewes, 2UlitimateBrands and Does 1-20, unknown individual and entities |
| 8:2019cv00285 |
| February 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #14 REQUEST to Substitute Attorney. Attorney David C Gurnick terminated. (twdb)
|
| Filing 14 First REQUEST to Substitute attorney Frank G. Blundo, Jr. in place of attorney David C. Gurnick filed by Plaintiff Curtis Chip Loeb Curtis Loeb. (Blundo, Frank) |
| Filing 13 SUPPLEMENT filed by Plaintiff Curtis Loeb. (Attorney Frank George Blundo, Jr added to party Curtis Loeb(pty:pla))(Blundo, Frank) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #10 Non-Resident Attorney Evan M. Goldman APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Curtis Loeb, designating David Gurnick as local counsel. (twdb)
|
|
Filing 11
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 10 Second APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Evan M. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Curtis Loeb (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Previously Paid on 2/13/2019, Receipt No. 26FD7IEC) filed by Plaintiff Curtis Loeb. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney Evan M. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice) (Gurnick, David) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 2UlitimateBrands, Loretta Hwong Griffiths, W. Scott Griffiths, Ron Love, Brigitte Love Thewes, Ultimate Brands, Inc., Ultimate Franchises, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Evan M. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Curtis Loeb (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23207091) #5 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. (lt) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Evan M. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Curtis Loeb (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23207091) filed by Plaintiff Curtis Loeb. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney Evan M. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice) (Gurnick, David) |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Curtis Loeb, (Gurnick, David) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Curtis Loeb. (Gurnick, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Curtis Loeb. (Gurnick, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23206497 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Curtis Loeb. (Attorney David C Gurnick added to party Curtis Loeb(pty:pla))(Gurnick, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
