Charisma Brands, LLC v. AMDL Collections, Inc.
| Charisma Brands, LLC |
| AMDL Collections, Inc. |
| 8:2019cv00312 |
| February 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen E Scott |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant AMDL Collections, Inc. (Lapin, Moshe) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant AMDL Collections, Inc. (Lapin, Moshe) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to AMDL Collections, Inc. answer now due 4/22/2019, filed by Defendant AMDL Collections, Inc..(Attorney Moshe D Lapin added to party AMDL Collections, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lapin, Moshe) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Charisma Brands, LLC, upon Defendant AMDL Collections, Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 3/25/2019, answer due 4/15/2019. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Dafne Le, President. (Gubernick, Deborah) |
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (tg) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant AMDL Collections, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (et) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Charisma Brands, LLC. (Gubernick, Deborah) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Charisma Brands, LLC, identifying Anthony (Tony) Shutts, Martin Krasner, Brian Blosil. (Gubernick, Deborah) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Charisma Brands, LLC. (Gubernick, Deborah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Charisma Brands, LLC. (Gubernick, Deborah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23224739 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Charisma Brands, LLC. (Attorney Deborah Ann Gubernick added to party Charisma Brands, LLC(pty:pla))(Gubernick, Deborah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Charisma Brands, LLC v. AMDL Collections, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AMDL Collections, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Moshe D Lapin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charisma Brands, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Sterling Flior |
| Represented By: | Jing Hua |
| Represented By: | Deborah Ann Gubernick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.