Sunterra Produce Traders, Inc. v. Rosario Marketing, Inc. et al
Sunterra Produce Traders, Inc. |
Ha Yun Chun and Rosario Marketing, Inc. |
8:2019cv00417 |
March 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andrew J Guilford |
Douglas F McCormick |
Agriculture Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 499 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Ha Yun Chun, Rosario Marketing, Inc. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (esa) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Sunterra Produce Traders, Inc.. (Monroe, June) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Sunterra Produce Traders, Inc. (Monroe, June) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sunterra Produce Traders, Inc., (Monroe, June) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sunterra Produce Traders, Inc.. (Monroe, June) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23309815 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Sunterra Produce Traders, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Invoices) (Attorney June T Monroe added to party Sunterra Produce Traders, Inc.(pty:pla))(Monroe, June) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.