Anthony Gonzalez v. 3M Company et al
| Anthony Gonzalez |
| AEARO Technologies, LLC, 3M Company and John Does |
| 8:2019cv00425 |
| March 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J Guilford |
| Karen E Scott |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Northern District of Florida, 3:19-cv-00738 filed 4/18/2019. (lom) |
| Filing 21 Conditional Transfer Order - 1 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2885, transferring case to USDC, Northern District of Florida and assigned to Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. Case transferred electronically. (es) |
Filing 20
ORDER ON PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PENDING RULINGS BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION #19 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court, having reviewed and considered the Plaintiff and Defendants' Joint Motion for a Stay of Proceedings (the "Motion"), and good cause appearing thereon, hereby grants the Motion to stay the action pending determination by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation regarding consolidation of matters. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (es)
|
| Filing 19 Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Rulings By the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation filed by Defendant 3M Company. Motion set for hearing on 4/29/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 [Proposed] Order on Parties' Joint Motion For Stay of Proceedings) (Branscome, Kimberly) |
| Filing 18 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant 3M Company identifying 3M Company as Corporate Parent. (Branscome, Kimberly) |
| Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kimberly O Branscome counsel for Defendant 3M Company. Adding Kimberly Branscome as counsel of record for 3M Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Attorney Kimberly O Branscome added to party 3M Company(pty:dft))(Branscome, Kimberly) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #13 , Notice (Other) #14 , Notice (Other) #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Response to Notice of Filing Fee Due. Failed to follow instructions. Notice specifically instructs attorney to fill out form and e-mail to cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lt) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE that Out-of-State Attorney Raymond C. Silverman Will Not Currently Be Appearing As An Attorney of Record In This Case filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gonzalez. (Drakulich, Robert) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE that Out-of-State Attorney Melanie H. Muhlstock Will Not Currently Be Appearing As An Attorney of Record In This Case filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gonzalez. (Drakulich, Robert) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE that Out-of-State Attorney Jerrold S. Parker Will Not Currently Be Appearing As An Attorney of Record In This Case filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gonzalez. (Drakulich, Robert) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 19-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:19-cv-00267 AG(KESx). Case referred from Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for Discovery. The case number will now read as follows: 8:19-cv-00425 AG(KESx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (rn)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Melanie H Muhlstock. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Raymond C Silverman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jerrold S Parker. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 3M Company, AEARO Technologies, LLC. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (et) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE/ NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gonzalez, (Drakulich, Robert) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gonzalez. Related Case(s): 5:19-cv-00353 (Drakulich, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gonzalez. (Drakulich, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gonzalez. (Drakulich, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23315342 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Anthony Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12) (Attorney Robert J Drakulich added to party Anthony Gonzalez(pty:pla))(Drakulich, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
