Nehemiah Kong v. William D. McClain et al
Nehemiah Kong |
Does 1-10, William D. McClain, Louise A. McClain and Kammarie Lyn McClain |
8:2019cv00448 |
March 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andrew J Guilford |
Karen E Scott |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MINUTE [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER FOR EARLY SCHEDULINGCONFERENCE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: The Court ORDERS that this hearing take place on April 22, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. *See document for further information. (es) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Kammarie Lyn McClain, Louise A. McClain, William D. McClain. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23332155 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Nehemiah Kong(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.