Mel Kleinman v. Carls Jr No 100735 et al
| Mel Kleinman |
| Temescal Village Plaza, LLC, CARL'S JR. ##100735, a Business of Unknown Form, Does 1-10 and Carls Jr No 100735 |
| 8:2019cv00533 |
| March 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Mel Kleinman. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Nakano, Jarrod) |
Filing 13
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter: The Court hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than June 3, 2019 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following as an appropriate response to this OSC if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Answer to Complaint; Request for Entry of Default; or Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (F.R.Civ.P.41). (See document for further details.) (es)
|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mel Kleinman, upon Defendant Temescal Village Plaza, LLC served on 5/1/2019, answer due 5/22/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Temescal Village Plaza, LLC in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Nakano, Jarrod) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mel Kleinman, upon Defendant Carls Jr No 100735 served on 4/30/2019, answer due 5/21/2019. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Nakano, Jarrod) |
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendants Carls Jr No 100735, Temescal Village Plaza, LLC. (twdb) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #7 filed by Plaintiff Mel Kleinman. (Nakano, Jarrod) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: Please put for the Central District of California. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Mel Kleinman, (Nakano, Jarrod) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mel Kleinman. (Nakano, Jarrod) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mel Kleinman. (Nakano, Jarrod) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23389080 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Mel Kleinman. (Attorney Jarrod Yutaka Nakano added to party Mel Kleinman(pty:pla))(Nakano, Jarrod) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
