Nehemiah Kong v. MUFG Union Bank, N.A. et al
| Nehemiah Kong |
| Does 1-10 and MUFG Union Bank, N.A. |
| 8:2019cv00542 |
| March 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J Guilford |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER #16 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. This Court hereby orders that the scheduling order shall be modified as follows: Expert initial disclosure deadline: August 21, 2019. Expert rebuttal deadline: September 20, 2019. Amendment deadline: September 3, 2019. Dispositive motion hearing deadline: August 19, 2019. (es)
|
| Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION for Order to modify Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gunderson, Sara) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Sara Gunderson on behalf of Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. Filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong (Attorney Sara Gunderson added to party Nehemiah Kong(pty:pla))(Gunderson, Sara) |
|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER SPECIFYING PROCEDURES by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (mku)
|
| Filing 13 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Discovery cut-off 8/19/2019. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/4/2019 at 8:30 a.m. Jury Trial set for 11/19/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (mku) |
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement of Interested Parties filed by Defendant MUFG Union Bank, N.A., identifying MUFG Union Bank, N.A.. (Orlick, Martin) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant MUFG Union Bank, N.A..(Orlick, Martin) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to MUFG Union Bank, N.A. answer now due 4/30/2019, filed by Defendant MUFG Union Bank, N.A..(Attorney Martin H Orlick added to party MUFG Union Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Orlick, Martin) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, upon Defendant MUFG Union Bank, N.A. served on 3/26/2019, answer due 4/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Branch Manager, Michael Gast. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER FOR EARLY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: The Court ORDERS that this hearing take place on May 6, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. (See order for further information.) (es)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant MUFG Union Bank, N.A. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23405616 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Nehemiah Kong(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
