United HealthCare Services Inc. v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
Plaintiff: United HealthCare Services Inc.
Defendant: Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2019cv00545
Filed: March 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E Scott
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MINUTES (In Chambers) ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS, REMOVING ACTION FROM ACTIVE CASELOAD AND DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO FILE STATUS REPORTS by Judge James V. Selna. In order to permit the Court to monitor this action, the Court hereby orders theparties to file a joint status report not later than October 11, 2019. (See document for further details.) (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (es)
June 10, 2019 Filing 36 NOTICE of Bankruptcy and Imposition of Automatic Stay filed by Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc.. (Gryce, Julie)
May 14, 2019 Filing 35 NOTICE filed by Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc.. of Petition to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation pursuant to Local Rule 83-1.4.3 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proof of Service)(Katsell, Noah)
May 6, 2019 Filing 34 [IN CHAMBERS] SCHEDULING NOTICE: On the Court's own motion,as this case was ordered stayed to 7/23/2019, the Scheduling Conference previously set for 5/20/2019 at 10:30 am is continued to 8/12/2019 at 10:30 am.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
April 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER GRANTING STAY FOR 90 DAYS FOLLOWING TAG-ALONG NOTICE OR UNTIL RESOLUTION OF TRANSFER MOTION BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION by Judge James V. Selna. Having considered the Stipulation, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Stipulation be GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that this matter is STAYED until the earlier of (i) July 23, 2019 (90 days from the parties' agreed filing date of April 25, 2019 for the tag-along notice) or (ii) resolution by the Panel of Insys's request to transfer this matter to the multidistrict litigation captioned In re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. (See document for further information.) (es)
April 11, 2019 Filing 32 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Filing of Tag-Along Notice or Until Resolution of Transfer Motion before the JPML filed by Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Katsell, Noah)
April 9, 2019 Filing 31 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff United HealthCare Services Inc., identifying UnitedHealth Group, Inc.. (Barclay, Lisa)
April 8, 2019 Filing 30 SUPPLEMENT to APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lisa L. Barclay to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff United HealthCare Services Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23444336) #22 filed by Plaintiff United HealthCare Services Inc.. (Barclay, Lisa)
April 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3) #25 , by Judge James V. Selna. Having considered the Stipulation, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Stipulation be GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc.s answer and/or response to the complaint in the above-captioned action shall be due on or before April 11, 2019. (es)
March 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: Granting #24 Non-Resident Attorney Amy J Mauser APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff United Healthcare Services Inc., designating David K Willingham as local counsel. (bm)
March 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: Granting #23 Non-Resident Attorney Hamish P M Hume APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff United Healthcare Services Inc., designating David K Willingham as local counsel. (bm)
March 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: Granting #22 Non-Resident Attorney Lisa L Barclay APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff United Healthcare Services Inc., designating David K Willingham as local counsel. (bm)
March 27, 2019 Filing 25 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Insys Therapeutics, Inc. answer now due 4/11/2019, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc..(Katsell, Noah)
March 26, 2019 Filing 24 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Amy J. Mauser to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff United HealthCare Services Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23444602) filed by Plaintiff United HealthCare Services Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Willingham, David)
March 26, 2019 Filing 23 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Hamish P.M. Hume to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff United HealthCare Services Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23444510) filed by Plaintiff United HealthCare Services Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Willingham, David)
March 26, 2019 Filing 22 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lisa L. Barclay to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff United HealthCare Services Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23444336) filed by Plaintiff United HealthCare Services Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order) (Willingham, David)
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: granting #18 Non-Resident Attorney Brian H. Benjet APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Insys Therapeutics, Inc., Defendant, designating Noah A. Katsell as local counsel. (twdb)
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: granting #19 Non-Resident Attorney Matthew A. Goldberg APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Insys Therapeutics, Inc., Defendant, designating Noah A. Katsell as local counsel. (twdb)
March 25, 2019 Filing 19 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Matthew A. Goldberg to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23436961) filed by Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Katsell, Noah)
March 25, 2019 Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brian H. Benjet to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23436916) filed by Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Katsell, Noah)
March 25, 2019 Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ilana H. Eisenstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23436770) filed by Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Katsell, Noah)
March 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment for Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge SACV19-00545 JVS(KESx). (lwag)
March 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference set for May 20, 2019 at 10:30 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by May 13, 2019. (lb)
March 21, 2019 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc., re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #13 served on March 21, 2019. (Katsell, Noah)
March 21, 2019 Filing 13 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb)
March 21, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Lisa L Barclay. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
March 21, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Amy J Mauser. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
March 21, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Hamish P M Hume. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
March 21, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Matthew A. Goldberg. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
March 21, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Ilana H. Eisenstein. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
March 21, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Brian H. Benjet. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
March 21, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
March 21, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (car)
March 20, 2019 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff United HealthCare Services Inc. Filed in State Court on 2/19/19 Submitted with Exhibit 1 attachment 1 to notice of removal #1 (car)
March 20, 2019 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Julie Ann Gryce counsel for Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc.. Adding Julie A. Gryce as counsel of record for Insys Therapeutics, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc.. (Attorney Julie Ann Gryce added to party Insys Therapeutics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Gryce, Julie)
March 20, 2019 Filing 3 Certifcation and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc., identifying United Healthcare Services Inc.. (Katsell, Noah)
March 20, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc.. (Katsell, Noah)
March 20, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2019-01052766-CU-FR-CJC Receipt No: 0973-23409530 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Insys Therapeutics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint), #2 Proof of Service) (Attorney Noah A Katsell added to party Insys Therapeutics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Katsell, Noah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United HealthCare Services Inc. v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United HealthCare Services Inc.
Represented By: Lisa L Barclay
Represented By: Hamish P M Hume
Represented By: Amy J Mauser
Represented By: David Karl Willingham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
Represented By: Julie Ann Gryce
Represented By: Noah A Katsell
Represented By: Matthew A Goldberg
Represented By: Brian H Benjet
Represented By: Ilana H Eisenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?