Michael C. Keo v. Vermeulen Properties 5, LLC
| Michael C. Keo |
| Vermeulan Properties 5, LLC |
| 8:2019cv00594 |
| March 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties request that the ADR Program assign a Panel Mediator from the following area of law: Americans with Disabilities Act and Unruh Civil Rights Act. Filed by Plaintiff Michael C. Keo(Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: granting #10 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to Defendant VERMEULEN PROPERTIES 5, LLC. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: 60 Days from date of this ORDER. (lc)
|
| Filing 10 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Vermeulan Properties 5, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Michael S Orr added to party Vermeulan Properties 5, LLC(pty:dft)) (Orr, Michael) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lom) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central District's website for additional information. See document for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Vermeulan Properties 5, LLC. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. KEO. (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. KEO, (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. KEO. (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23457206 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. KEO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Pamela Tsao added to party MICHAEL C. KEO(pty:pla))(Tsao, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Michael C. Keo v. Vermeulen Properties 5, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Vermeulan Properties 5, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael S Orr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael C. Keo | |
| Represented By: | Pamela Tsao |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
