Kristopher Gordon v. Halle J. Benett et al
| Kristopher Gordon |
| Steven A. Sugarman, Chad T. Brownstein, Richard J Lashley, John Grosvenor, Robert Sznewajs, Eric Holoman, Douglas H Bowers, Banc of California, Inc., Jeffrey Karish, Halle J. Benett and Jonah Schnel |
| 8:2019cv00621 |
| April 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. upon John Grosvenor waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/26/2019, answer due 8/26/2019. Waiver of Service signed by John Gildersleeve. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Robert Moss Tiefenbrun on behalf of Defendants Halle J. Benett, Douglas H Bowers, Jeffrey Karish, Richard J Lashley, Jonah Schnel, Robert Sznewajs (Attorney Robert Moss Tiefenbrun added to party Halle J. Benett(pty:dft), Attorney Robert Moss Tiefenbrun added to party Douglas H Bowers(pty:dft), Attorney Robert Moss Tiefenbrun added to party Jeffrey Karish(pty:dft), Attorney Robert Moss Tiefenbrun added to party Richard J Lashley(pty:dft), Attorney Robert Moss Tiefenbrun added to party Jonah Schnel(pty:dft), Attorney Robert Moss Tiefenbrun added to party Robert Sznewajs(pty:dft))(Tiefenbrun, Robert) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Roman E Darmer, II on behalf of Defendants Halle J. Benett, Douglas H Bowers, Jeffrey Karish, Richard J Lashley, Jonah Schnel, Robert Sznewajs (Attorney Roman E Darmer, II added to party Halle J. Benett(pty:dft), Attorney Roman E Darmer, II added to party Douglas H Bowers(pty:dft), Attorney Roman E Darmer, II added to party Jeffrey Karish(pty:dft), Attorney Roman E Darmer, II added to party Richard J Lashley(pty:dft), Attorney Roman E Darmer, II added to party Jonah Schnel(pty:dft), Attorney Roman E Darmer, II added to party Robert Sznewajs(pty:dft))(Darmer, Roman) |
| Filing 24 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. upon Chad T. Brownstein waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/25/2019, answer due 8/26/2019. Waiver of Service signed by Robert Sacks. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
| Filing 23 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. upon Robert Sznewajs waiver sent by Plaintiff on 5/24/2019, answer due 7/23/2019. Waiver of Service signed by Roman E. Darmer. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
| Filing 22 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. upon Jonah Schnel waiver sent by Plaintiff on 5/24/2019, answer due 7/23/2019. Waiver of Service signed by Roman E. Darmer. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
| Filing 21 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. upon Richard J Lashley waiver sent by Plaintiff on 5/24/2019, answer due 7/23/2019. Waiver of Service signed by Roman E. Darmer. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
| Filing 20 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. upon Jeffrey Karish waiver sent by Plaintiff on 5/24/2019, answer due 7/23/2019. Waiver of Service signed by Roman E. Darmer. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
| Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. upon Douglas H Bowers waiver sent by Plaintiff on 5/24/2019, answer due 7/23/2019. Waiver of Service signed by Roman E. Darmer. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
| Filing 18 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. upon Halle J. Benett waiver sent by Plaintiff on 5/24/2019, answer due 7/23/2019. Waiver of Service signed by Roman E. Darmer. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Banc of California, Inc. answer now due 7/15/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Nominal Defendant Banc of California, Inc..(McDonald, Mark) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Waiver of Service #15 , Proof of Service #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Case number reads SA CV 19-621-AG-KES (Dkt. 14) and SA CV 19-623-CJC-DFM (Dkt. 15), case number should read SA CV 19-00621-CJC-DFM. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. upon Steven A. Sugarman waiver sent by Plaintiff on 5/24/2019, answer due 7/23/2019. Waiver of Service signed by Andrew R. Gray, Esq. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kristopher Gordon, upon Defendant Banc of California, Inc. served on 5/24/2019, answer due 6/14/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Joyce Woods - My Corporation Business Services, Inc. - Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
Filing 13
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:17-cv-01678-CJC-DFMx. Case transferred from Judge Andrew J. Guilford to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:19-cv-00621-CJC-DFMx. Signed by Judge Cormac J. Carney. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Nominal Defendant Banc of California, Inc.. Related Case(s): 17-cv-01678-CJC-DFM; No. 18-cv-00246-CJC-DFM (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McDonald, Mark) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Mark R S Foster counsel for Defendant Banc of California, Inc.. Adding Mark R.S. Foster as counsel of record for Banc of California, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Nominal Defendant Banc of California, Inc.. (Attorney Mark R S Foster added to party Banc of California, Inc.(pty:dft))(Foster, Mark) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Mark R McDonald counsel for Defendant Banc of California, Inc.. Adding Mark R. McDonald as counsel of record for Banc of California, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Nominal Defendant Banc of California, Inc.. (Attorney Mark R McDonald added to party Banc of California, Inc.(pty:dft))(McDonald, Mark) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 19-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: SACV17-00118 AG (DFMx). Case referred from Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for Discovery. The case number will now read as follows: SACV19-00621 AG (DFMx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lwag)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney MARSHALL P. DEES. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney COREY D. HOLZER. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Banc of California, Inc., Halle J. Benett, Douglas H Bowers, Chad T. Brownstein, John Grosvenor, Eric Holoman, Jeffrey Karish, Richard J Lashley, Jonah Schnel, Steven A. Sugarman and Robert Sznewajs. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. (Jonckheer, Willem) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23485638 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Kristopher Gordon. (Attorney Willem F Jonckheer added to party Kristopher Gordon(pty:pla))(Jonckheer, Willem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
